This week's crawl is still processing.

No sites have finished measuring yet. The reading appears here as soon as the first results land.

This week's reading

Read the web on two axes.

sites measured · How we measure →
A · Restrained B · Tracks anyway C · Minimal D · Unrestrained ◦ → ● bubble size = tracking footprint
Inspect

Every site, every measure

Click a column to sort · click a row to inspect.
Site Vertical Grade Consent Restraint Do-Not-Sell

Consent = consent-effort score (0–100, higher is more effort) · Restraint = tracking-restraint score (0–100, higher means fewer tracking companies reached by default) · Do-Not-Sell = opt-out link detected · hover any column header for detail.

Limits

What this instrument can't see

The honest edges of the measurement — methodology published in full.

One vantage point

We crawl as a first-time U.S. visitor. Sites that behave differently for European visitors — or gate tracking only for certain states — show us their U.S. default, nothing else.

Restraint can be invisible

A site that blocks its tags entirely until consent shows us nothing — indistinguishable from having no tags at all. We only credit restraint we can observe, and never count its absence against a site.

Ties are real ties

Sites with only a privacy policy score exactly alike, so they plot exactly alike. We don't scatter points artificially to look more precise than the measurement is.

One visit, weekly

Ad markets are dynamic — the exact vendor set varies visit to visit. Breadth of distinct parties is far more stable than request counts, but week-to-week movement is normal. Some heavy media sites remain under-sampled.

Observable indicators, not legal conclusions. Grades reflect the tracking and consent behavior we can measure by crawling each site, not legal judgments about any organization.